Kling AI and Seedream 4.5 Just DESTROYED Nano Banana and Veo 3 | Artlist AI UPDATE
TLDRIn this video, the creator compares three new image generators—Cadream 4.5, Cling 2.6, and Cling 01—against Nano Banana and VO3.1, showcasing their superior speed, quality, and affordability. Cadream 4.5 delivers stunning images with impressive lighting and detail, while Nano Banana falls short in comparison. The creator also demonstrates how Seedream excels at image-to-image generation and combining multiple images seamlessly. Additionally, the video explores Cling 2.6 Pro and Cling 01 for video creation, offering impressive results with much lower credit costs than other tools. Artlist’s current sale offers discounts on AI tools, making it a great time to try them out.
Takeaways
- 🔥Cadream (referred to as Cream/Cdream in the video) and Cling models on Artlist outperform Nano Banana and VO3.1 in quality, speed, and cost, while the Seedream 4.5 bytedance API offers additional capabilities for advanced users.
- 💸 Text-to-image cost: Nano Banana Pro costs ~400 credits per generation, while Cadream costs ~100 credits — about 4× cheaper.
- 🎨 Cadream produced a more accurate, better-lit sloth image (plus a hummingbird) using the same prompt that made Nano Banana produce a giant/slightly off result.
- 🧩 Seedream (Seedream/Artlist image-to-image) can combine multiple images and preserve legible branding and packaging when asked.
- 🔁 The creator reused the exact same prompt across models to compare quality and cost directly, showing Cadream’s stronger prompt adherence for T2I.
- 🎞️ Artlist’s video models — Cling 2.6 Pro and Cling 01 — convert stills to animated video: Cling 2.6 excels at prompt adherence and lip-syncing dialogue.
- ➡️ Cling 01 supports start & end frame uploads plus tag recognition, enabling fly-through setups using a wide first-frame and a final ad frame.
- ⚡ The two Cling video generations together used roughly the same credits as a single 10-second Google VO3 generation — much more cost-efficient.
- 🛠️ The creator used Artlist’s Prompt Enhancer to expand a simple prompt and achieve higher-quality results from Cadream.
- 👍 Many of the showcased Cadream and ClArtlist AI comparisoning outputs were first-try successes — the presenter emphasizes minimal iteration.
- 🤔 In a direct A/B, Nano Banana sometimes produced interesting elements (e.g., a can on the tree) but also produced awkward artifacts (e.g., sloth holding a can in its teeth).
- 📣 The presenter declares Cadream and Cling their new go-to models and challenges competitors like Google with Artlist’s better value proposition.
- 🏷️ Artlist is running a large sale (up to 40% off AI annual plans) and the presenter offers a link that adds two free months to subscriptions.
- 🎯 Overall message: Artlist’s newest models deliver superior visual quality, better prompt fidelity, and significant credit savings for both image and video generation.
Q & A
What are the three new image generators mentioned in the video?
-The three new image generators are Cadream 4.5, Cling 2.6, and Cling 01.
How does Cadream 4.5 compare to Nano Banana Pro in terms of cost?
-Cadream 4.5 is significantly cheaper than Nano Banana Pro, with one text-to-image generation costing 100 credits for Cadream, compared to 400 credits for Nano Banana Pro.
What is the main advantage of Cadream 4.5 over Nano Banana Pro, as shown in the video?
-The main advantage of Cadream 4.5 is its higher quality image generation at a much lower cost. For example, it produces a better sloth image with better lighting and details, while Nano Banana Pro's result was less accurate.
What additional feature does Seedream offer that Nano Banana also supports?
-Seedream offers both text-to-image and image-to-image generation, similar to Nano Banana, allowing users to combine multiple images to create a new one.
How did Cadream 4.5 handle the combination of the sloth image and energy drink mockup?
-Cadream 4.5 successfully combined the sloth image with the energy drink mockup, keeping the branding consistent and the text legibleJSON code correction, even though the result appeared more animated.
What issue did the video highlight with Nano Banana Pro's generated imageAI image generator comparison of the sloth with the energy drink?
-The issue with Nano Banana Pro's result was that the sloth was holding the drink in an awkward manner, appearing to grip the can with its teeth, which detracted from the realism of the image.
How did Cling 2.6 Pro animate the sloth image, and what was the unique feature used?
-Cling 2.6 Pro was used to animate the sloth image by syncing text or dialogue to the sloth's speech. The unique feature was the use of unusual punctuation, like triple dots, to make the sloth appear confused.
What is the main distinction between Cling 2.6 Pro and Cling 01?
-Cling 2.6 Pro is focused on animating images and syncing speech to characters, while Cling 01 is designed for creating start and end frames for videos and includes tag recognition, allowing for smooth transitions and animations between frames.
How does the credit cost of Cling 2.6 Pro compare to VO3.1?
-Cling 2.6 Pro costs almost half the credits of VO3.1, making it a more cost-effective option for video generation. For detailed pricing information, check the Seedream 4.5 API pricing.
What special offer does Art List provide, as mentioned in the video?
-Art List is offering up to 40% off their AI annual plan, along with two free months added to any subscription when using a special link.
Outlines
🚀 New ImageImage generator comparison Generators: Cream 4.5, Cling 2.6, and Cling01 vs. Nano Banana and VO3.1
The video starts by introducing three new image generation models—Cream 4.5, Cling 2.6, and Cling01—that are faster, cheaper, and more effective than previous models like Nano Banana and VO3.1. The speaker demonstrates how the new Art List models offer superior results with lower credit costs. Specifically, Cream 4.5 is shown to generate a high-quality image of a sloth at a much cheaper price (100 credits compared to Nano Banana Pro's 400 credits). The speaker compares both models using a simple sloth prompt, showing how the Nano Banana Pro image falls short in terms of lighting and accuracy. Furthermore, Cream 4.5 excels in generating a combined image by blending a sloth and energy drink mockup, which Nano Banana Pro struggles with.
🖼️ Image to Image Generation: Combining Models and Creativity
The speaker demonstrates how Cream 4.5 (Seedream) not only excels in text-to-image generation but also in image-to-image transformations. Using a sloth and energy drink mockup, the model successfully blends the two images into a cohesive scene, keeping branding legible and the overall result looking professional. In contrast, Nano Banana Pro's attempt results in an awkward image where the sloth holds the can in a strange way. Despite Nano Banana's better depiction of the can, Cream 4.5 is deemed the winner for itsNew image generators comparison cleaner and more effective rendering.
🎬 Exploring Video Generation with Cling 2.6 Pro and Cling01
The speaker introduces Cling 2.6 Pro and Cling 01 as new video generation models that provide impressive capabilities. Cling 2.6 Pro is ideal for animating static images, making it perfect for creating talking characters. The speaker demonstrates this by animating a sloth and syncing it to a dialogue prompt. Cling 2.6 Pro's lower credit cost compared to VO3.1 is also emphasized, showcasing how it can deliver photorealistic results. The video generation models are shown to work efficiently without compromising quality, even when using complicated punctuation in the prompt.
🌲 Advanced Video Creation: Wide Shots and Fly-Through Animation with Cling01
Cling 01 is introduced as the model for advanced video creation, offering unique features like start and end frame uploads and tag recognition. The speaker creates a fly-through video of a forest using a wide shot as the first frame and an energy drink ad as the last frame. By incorporating these features, Cling 01 allows for seamless transitions and animation, proving its potential in cinematic production. The speaker highlights how Cling 01 works alongside Cling 2.6 Pro to create detailed, professional-level animations with minimal credits, further demonstrating the capabilities of Art List's new video generation tools.
💥 The Gauntlet is Thrown: Art List's Models vs. Google VO3 and Big Sale Announcement
The speaker concludes the video by declaring Art List’s new models—Cream 4.5 and Cling— as their go-to tools for image and video generation. They compare the credit costs and results to Google VO3, emphasizing how Art List’s offerings are more affordable and efficient. Additionally, Art List’s biggest sale of all time is mentioned, offering up to 40% off annual plans and two extra free months for users who sign up via the speaker’s link. The speaker encourages viewers to take advantage of the sale and test out the new models themselves.
📚 Learn More: AI VFX for Practical Use
The speaker wraps up by promoting a related video that teaches AI VFX techniques that are not only impressive but also practically useful for viewers. The recommendation serves as a segue to further explore AI-powered visual effects and their real-world applications.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Artlist AI
💡Cream 4.5
💡Nano Banana Pro
💡Veo 3.1
💡Seedream
💡Image-to-image generation
💡Cling 2.6 Pro
💡Cling 01
💡Prompt Enhancer
💡Credit cost
Highlights
Kling AI and Seedream 4.5 outperform Nano Banana and Veo 3 in both speed and cost-effectiveness.
Cadream 4.5 is introduced as a new model with a 100-credit cost for text-to-image generation, significantly cheaper than Nano Banana Pro (400 credits).
Cadream 4.5's sloth image generation results are praised for superior lighting and added details like a hummingbird, compared to Nano Banana's flat image.
Image-to-image generation in Seedream allows for combining images, as demonstrated with a sloth energy drink mockup.
Cadream 4.5 effectively combines the sloth and energy drink mockup, keeping text and branding consistent.
Nano Banana Pro struggles with odd placements in the sloth image, such as holding the can in its teeth, highlighting Cadream 4.5's superiority.
Cling 2.6 Pro and Cling 01 are introduced as powerful video generation models on Art List.
Cling 2.6 Pro excels in animating images and syncing dialogue, creating a sloth character that speaksKling AI vs Seedream in a unique, confused tone.
Cling 2.6 Pro costs almost half the credits of VO3.1, offering significant savings without compromising on quality.
Cling 01 is shown to support start and end frame uploads, useful for creating complex video sequences, such as a fly-through shot for the sloth energy ad.
The combination of Cling 2.6 Pro and Cling 01 models for video generation requires fewer credits than a single 10-second Google VO3 generation.
The video generation process using Art List's AI models was smooth, with impressive results on the first try.
Art List is running a major sale, offering up to 40% off their AI annual plans, with an additional two free months for subscribers.
The reviewer expresses excitement about using Creem and Cling models as their go-to tools for future AI projects.
The video concludes with an invitation to explore AI VFX through another tutorial, signaling the growing capabilities of these tools.